logo

96 pages 3 hours read

Walter Isaacson

The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race

Walter IsaacsonNonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 5-8Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 5 Summary: “The Human Genome”

The Human Genome Project was formally launched in 1990, with James Watson as its first director. The project is an ambitious international collaboration to figure out the 3 billion pairs of bases in human DNA and the more than 20,000 genes these pairs encode. However, the project has a complex history, especially when it comes to the controversial field of eugenics, which implies certain human traits are more desirable than others. Watson voiced such controversial opinions, especially after his son Rufus was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Determined to disprove the notion that upbringing and environment played a part in Rufus’s condition, Watson believed his son’s troubles lay in “his genes.”

Men occupied all the leading roles on Watson’s team. Filled with competing egos like Francis Collins (Watson’s successor at the Human Genome Project), whizkid geneticist Eric Lander, and controversial biotech entrepreneur Craig Venter, the Human Genome Project soon turned into a competition. Finding a cheaper method for faster base sequencing, Venter broke away to form the private firm Celera. In turn, Watson and Lander doubled down on their work. So public was the competition between the two groups that in early 2000, President Bill Clinton had to coax Venter and Collins to come together to share credit for the discoveries of the Human Genome Project. In total, $3 billion were spent on the project. Some scientists, like Szostak’s team member George Church, have always questioned if the project was worth the hype—and the spending. As it turned out, discovering a map of human DNA did not lead to a cure for congenital diseases like sickle cell anemia. Approaching that goal would require focusing on another “worker-bee” molecule apart from DNA, the one that interested Doudna.

Chapter 6 Summary: “RNA”

While DNA protects the genetic information it encodes, it stays at its home in the nucleus of living cells. It is RNA that travels out of the cell to do important work, such as making proteins. At the time of the Human Genome Project, it was believed that RNA’s main job was to carry out the instructions of the DNA, hence the commonly used term “messenger-RNA” (m-RNA). A segment of DNA encoding a gene is transcribed into a snippet of RNA, which travels to the cell’s manufacturing site and enables amino acids to assemble in a specific sequence to make a specific protein. One of the most fascinating proteins RNA helps make are enzymes, which serve as catalysts of biology. Francis Crick called the process of genetic information moving from DNA to RNA to build proteins the “central dogma” of life, a term he later reconsidered.

However, as early as the 1980s, Thomas Cech and Sidney Altman independently discovered that some forms of RNA could also function as enzymes (a departure from the idea that RNA’s only role was to carry out DNA’s instructions). While studying introns, or sequences of DNA (and RNA) that do not contain coded genetic information, Cech and Altman found that some RNA molecules—which they dubbed “ribozymes”—could split themselves, causing a chemical reaction. Typically, clogging introns need to be cut out of RNA by enzymes and the RNA pasted back. However, Cech and Altman found that certain RNA molecules were self-splicing, or performing the cut-and-paste job themselves.

In 1986, Doudna decided to conduct her doctoral research under Szostak, whose focus had shifted from the DNA of yeast to its RNA. Szostak wanted to see if ribozymes could do more than self-splice: Could they replicate themselves? Doudna immersed herself in working on RNA, a risky move at a time when DNA was the toast of the scientific community. Yet Szostak and Doudna knew that if they could figure out the structure of the RNA molecule, then they could perhaps answer the grandest question of science: How did life begin?

Biological principles dictate that life began when DNA, RNA, and proteins combined together. However, it is unlikely that all three molecules originated from “the primordial stew” at the same time. If RNA could be shown to replicate itself, it could be argued that RNA was the original molecule of life. Szostak and Doudna began to unravel how RNA replicated by engineering a self-splicing ribozyme. When the findings were published in Nature in 1989, Doudna began to be recognized as a rising star in the world of biology. But Doudna wanted to explore RNA even further, to understand its molecular structure, a project that was considered almost impossible.

Chapter 7 Summary: “Twists and Folds”

To understand how some RNA replicated itself, Doudna realized she needed to learn structural biology. For her postdoctoral work, Doudna partnered with one of the scientists who had won the Nobel Prize for discovering ribozymes: Thomas Cech of the University of Colorado, Boulder. In Colorado, Cech was using X-ray crystallography to study RNA the same way Rosalind Franklin had studied DNA. Doudna’s move to Boulder was also prompted by her recent marriage to Harvard medical student Tom Griffin. Griffin, who was from a military family, loved Colorado. However, owing to their differing interests, the couple separated a few years after the move.

At Cech’s lab, Doudna figured out that if she determined the three-dimensional structure of the intron, she could see how its twists and folds brought the right atoms together to catalyze the snippet of RNA to replicate itself. Doudna started with crystallizing RNA, with the help of graduate student Jamie Cate. A serendipitous lab accident involving an overheated incubator revealed RNA could in fact crystallize at higher temperatures. Though Doudna began to achieve good crystals, they often broke down under X-ray. Tom Steitz, a Yale biochemist visiting Boulder, suggested to Cate that they cryocool the crystals in liquid nitrogen (which freezes matter very fast) so their structure would be preserved even under X-ray. Soon, Doudna had enough high-quality crystals for her to eventually learn RNA’s structure. Impressed by Steitz’s lab, Doudna accepted a tenure-track position at Yale after finishing her postdoctoral work in 1993. Cate transferred to Yale so he could continue working with Doudna.

Though the crystals Doudna and Cate had achieved diffracted X-rays well, the duo were hit by another roadblock: the “phase problem,” as it is known in crystallography parlance. X-ray detectors can measure the intensity of a wave, but not its phase or location within a wave cycle. One way to tackle the problem is to introduce metal ions in the crystal. Since X-rays can map metal, they can pinpoint the location of the wave and use it to calculate the rest of the molecular structure. The metal-ion method had never been tried successfully with RNA. Cate solved the problem by using osmium hexamine, a molecule that has an affinity for interacting with nooks of RNA. Consequently, Cate and Doudna were able to achieve an electron density map that would provide vital clues about the structure of an important portion of the RNA they were studying.

While Doudna was coming closer to the answer of RNA’s structure, her father Martin was fading from metastatic cancer. Doudna spent the fall of 1995 flying between New Haven and Hilo to spend time with her father, and she found that discussing her work with him helped clarify her ideas about what the data meant. When Martin died a few months later, his passing coincided with Doudna’s first major scientific achievement. Doudna, Cate, and their team had successfully determined the location of every atom in a self-splicing RNA molecule. A specific area in the molecule enabled RNA to pack helices together and create its three-dimensional shape. What was special to this area? Doudna and her team showed that a cluster of metal ions in that domain formed a core around which the structure folded. In a prescient statement about her celebrated discovery, Doudna said that one of the possibilities of knowing RNA was an ability to treat people with genetic defects.

Chapter 8 Summary: “Berkeley”

Doudna and Cate’s collaboration soon grew into a romantic partnership. The two married in Hilo in summer 2000; their only child, Andrew, was born two years later. Since the family wanted to be in the same location, Doudna accepted a job offer from the University of California, Berkeley. There, Doudna became interested in how the RNA in some viruses, such as coronaviruses, enabled them to hijack a cell’s protein-building machinery.

In fall 2002, during Doudna’s first semester at Berkeley, there was a deadly coronavirus outbreak in China. The virus was named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-CoV. In 2020, with the emergence of another infectious coronavirus, it would be renamed SARS-CoV 1.

Doudna’s other interest at Berkeley became a phenomenon known as RNA interference. Normally, genes encoded in DNA send messenger-RNAs to direct the building of proteins. However, certain small molecules intercept and corrupt the RNA. RNA interference works by deploying an enzyme known as “Dicer,” which snips a strip of RNA into fragments. These small fragments or molecules seek out a messenger RNA with matching letters and use a scissor-like enzyme to slice and silence it. Through X-ray crystallography, Doudna learned that Dicer acts like a ruler, with a clamp at one end to grab an RNA and a cleaver at the other to slice the segment at the correct length. Doudna and her team also showed how Dicer could be reengineered to “silence other genes.” In other words, RNA interference could have potential uses in treating genetic conditions. Additionally, RNA interference can be potentially utilized to fight viruses. Organisms other than humans do deploy RNA interference to fight off viruses. Researchers hope that drugs based on RNA interference may someday be used to treat severe viral infections in humans, like SARS-Cov-2. Doudna’s findings on Dicer were published in Science in 2006. A few months later, a scientist from Spain published a paper on another virus-fighting mechanism as seen in micro-organisms, such as bacteria. At first, it was assumed this mechanism also worked through RNA interference. However, the phenomenon would turn out to be different.

Chapters 5-8 Analysis

In Chapters 5-8, Isaacson focuses on how the underdogs of the molecular world often hold answers to science’s biggest questions. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the case of RNA, which for the longest time was DNA’s neglected sibling. RNA’s story is similar to the story of women in science, whose work is often overlooked because of male showboating. For instance, the Human Genome Project which involves DNA is depicted as much-hyped, extremely well-funded, and driven by competitive male scientists. It is also backed by grandiose language, such as Bill Clinton’s statement, “Today we are learning the language in which God created life” (54). However, the project is so focused on DNA that the scientists overlooked a crucial fact: “Reading” human genes is not enough; targeting disease-causing mutations also requires the ability to “write” genetic code. It is RNA, not DNA, that writes that code. Sometimes, scientists get so lost in the big picture that they forget that nature works in subtle, minute ways.

Similarly, Chapter 6 stresses the role of enzymes in cellular physiology, clarifying that “almost every action that takes place in a cell needs to be catalyzed by an enzyme” (58). This is in keeping with the text’s larger themes about the centrality of every small detail in natural processes and scientific discovery. Little in nature is redundant, a detail that recurs in later chapters.

Chapter 5 touches upon another important theme: that human beings are complex, or “mosaic” entities. Consider the case of James Watson. A pioneering inventor, Watson often expresses views that are sexist, racist, and problematic. Yet Doudna often cites him as an important influence, observing that though Watson is a provocateur, in practice he was a good mentor to women scientists. Isaacson attempts to capture Watson’s character as a mosaic rather than imply that his genius excuses his problematic views. Such a view is particularly important to Doudna, who likes to see people in “grayscale.”

Further, these chapters introduce the textual motif of the importance of structural biochemistry. Scientists can often learn how a molecule works by first visualizing its structure. The structure, then, is the molecule’s function. Just as DNA’s double helix structure revealed how it stores and transmits genetic information, the twisting and folded RNA structure discovered by Doudna’s team explained how RNA could be an enzyme that can slice, splice, and replicate itself. Notably, structural biology stands at the threshold between biology and chemistry, emphasizing the importance of a cross-disciplinary approach in science.

In Chapter 8, Isaacson explores the importance of federal funding for universities. It is no coincidence that Doudna flourished at Berkeley, which is traditionally a funded university, thus inviting the best talent irrespective of financial means. Berkeley has its roots in the College of Agricultural, Mining, and Mechanical Arts near Oakland, founded in 1866 as the result of Abraham Lincoln’s push for federally funded colleges. The college merged with the nearby private College of California to become Berkeley. Till the 1980s, more than half of Berkeley’s funding came from the state. Sadly, Berkeley, like most other public institutions in the United States, has faced funding reductions since then. In 2018, state funding was less than 14%; consequently, undergraduate tuition for out-of-state students has climbed to $66,000 a year. The increasing privatization of education undoes the happy complex of state, enterprise, and academia which has been a uniquely American feature.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 96 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 9,100+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools